The line for the bus to Buenos Aires was long today. Usually, a trip to the big city is an uncomplicated hour trip, and I rarely wait more than 10 minutes for the bus. Today, it took much longer. The line stretched to the corner of the block. As always, it was perfectly straight. Finally, the bus arrived.
As we boarded, a man ran up and tried to cut the line. “Che, hay una cola,” someone objected. “Hey man, there’s a line.” The would-be cutter hung his head and slouched off to the end of the line, taking his rightful and non-negotiable place in the most egalitarian of all Argentine institutions: the line, or as it as known here, la cola. (In proper Spanish, fila is line, and cola means tail, or ass. Argentine slang is rich in double entendres.)
Some social scientists may take issue with my designation of the line as a social institution. I suggest any pointy-headed detractors pull their heads out of their colas and spend some time waiting in colas. (Or is it filas?) Like any society, Argentina has a complex system of norms and expectations entirely apart from the law. It can be difficult to understand--the concept of timeliness is confounding, and the rules of the road are simultaneously Darwinian and illogical--but rules about lines are rock-solid. As evidenced by the boludo (fool, jerk) who tried to cut the cola this morning, those who transgress this norm are shamed.
Lines rarely curve here: when they must deviate from a perfectly straight path, they tend to make sharp, clear turns, like the number seven. When lines do curve, they seem to have been drawn with a compass. At least in this aspect of Argentine life, predictability is valued.
Lines materialize, even when they seem not to exist. There is some sort of southern-cone spidey sense that helps Argentines know who arrived first. I haven’t picked up on these cues, but I appreciate them. “¿Estás próximo, no?” I am often asked while waiting: “You’re next, right?” It’s not so much a question as a gentle reminder that it’s my turn, and that I should have known that.
It must be said that Argentines have lots of practice with these lines, and it shows. Government institutions, and plenty of businesses, remain inscrutable mazes of red tape and confusing--sometimes contradictory--requirements, and I sometimes wonder if these perfect lines are a reaction to bureaucratic processes that reward the slightest irregularity with a quick rejection. Perhaps the Argentine fondness for lines formed in reaction to bureaucratic confusion, an attempt, if you will, to bring some level of order and predictability to government and business proceedings. Or, could it be the reverse? Could such predictably perfect lines enable bureaucratic arbitrariness? I think I would need to spend much more time in colas to answer this question.
More likely, though, this admirable (if somewhat excessive) focus on waiting one’s turn stems from Argentina’s emphasis on solidarity and egalitarianism. The disastrous neoliberal policies of the last 40 years have dramatically increased the gap between rich and poor here, but old ideals of advancing together, as Argentines, die hard. Like any national narrative, Argentina’s story about fairness and equality is part fiction, part fact. Argentina, the story goes, was once a more equal country, and nostalgia for this partially invented past is strong.
This telling of history largely excludes women (the franchise wasn’t extended to them until 1951), indigenous groups, poor immigrants (both European and later other Latin Americans), and other groups outside traditional narratives of Argentine statehood and progress. It is much easier to see a mostly middle-class society when one doesn’t go looking for poverty and inequality. I don’t know if the lines were just as straight at the height of Argentine power and wealth in the 1920’s, but the people who stood in them would have been far from equal.
My class attendance here has been spotty, but one clear lesson has been that the truth about the past doesn’t matter half as much as what people think is true. (See Turkey.) This can be dangerous, but here in Argentina, I think nostalgia for a more equal past is positive, as long as attempts to build a fairer future are actually inclusive. Based at least on the lines I stand in, that seems likely. Waiting in line here, we really are all equal, and remarkably civil about it too.
I joined a different kind of line a few nights ago, when I went for a nocturnal jog around La Plata’s main plaza. Unlike the queues for buses, the long line of runners, walkers, and in-line skaters was not so strictly regulated. The trees here absorb water during springtime’s regular, semi-tropical rainstorms, and release it when the skies are clear. So on this night, it felt as if it were raining, but the sky was clear and the stars were out. The big, cool drops are welcome during hot afternoons, and I appreciated them even more as I turned three, four, five laps around Plaza Moreno, cutting the line as I went.
As we boarded, a man ran up and tried to cut the line. “Che, hay una cola,” someone objected. “Hey man, there’s a line.” The would-be cutter hung his head and slouched off to the end of the line, taking his rightful and non-negotiable place in the most egalitarian of all Argentine institutions: the line, or as it as known here, la cola. (In proper Spanish, fila is line, and cola means tail, or ass. Argentine slang is rich in double entendres.)
Some social scientists may take issue with my designation of the line as a social institution. I suggest any pointy-headed detractors pull their heads out of their colas and spend some time waiting in colas. (Or is it filas?) Like any society, Argentina has a complex system of norms and expectations entirely apart from the law. It can be difficult to understand--the concept of timeliness is confounding, and the rules of the road are simultaneously Darwinian and illogical--but rules about lines are rock-solid. As evidenced by the boludo (fool, jerk) who tried to cut the cola this morning, those who transgress this norm are shamed.
Lines rarely curve here: when they must deviate from a perfectly straight path, they tend to make sharp, clear turns, like the number seven. When lines do curve, they seem to have been drawn with a compass. At least in this aspect of Argentine life, predictability is valued.
Lines materialize, even when they seem not to exist. There is some sort of southern-cone spidey sense that helps Argentines know who arrived first. I haven’t picked up on these cues, but I appreciate them. “¿Estás próximo, no?” I am often asked while waiting: “You’re next, right?” It’s not so much a question as a gentle reminder that it’s my turn, and that I should have known that.
It must be said that Argentines have lots of practice with these lines, and it shows. Government institutions, and plenty of businesses, remain inscrutable mazes of red tape and confusing--sometimes contradictory--requirements, and I sometimes wonder if these perfect lines are a reaction to bureaucratic processes that reward the slightest irregularity with a quick rejection. Perhaps the Argentine fondness for lines formed in reaction to bureaucratic confusion, an attempt, if you will, to bring some level of order and predictability to government and business proceedings. Or, could it be the reverse? Could such predictably perfect lines enable bureaucratic arbitrariness? I think I would need to spend much more time in colas to answer this question.
More likely, though, this admirable (if somewhat excessive) focus on waiting one’s turn stems from Argentina’s emphasis on solidarity and egalitarianism. The disastrous neoliberal policies of the last 40 years have dramatically increased the gap between rich and poor here, but old ideals of advancing together, as Argentines, die hard. Like any national narrative, Argentina’s story about fairness and equality is part fiction, part fact. Argentina, the story goes, was once a more equal country, and nostalgia for this partially invented past is strong.
This telling of history largely excludes women (the franchise wasn’t extended to them until 1951), indigenous groups, poor immigrants (both European and later other Latin Americans), and other groups outside traditional narratives of Argentine statehood and progress. It is much easier to see a mostly middle-class society when one doesn’t go looking for poverty and inequality. I don’t know if the lines were just as straight at the height of Argentine power and wealth in the 1920’s, but the people who stood in them would have been far from equal.
My class attendance here has been spotty, but one clear lesson has been that the truth about the past doesn’t matter half as much as what people think is true. (See Turkey.) This can be dangerous, but here in Argentina, I think nostalgia for a more equal past is positive, as long as attempts to build a fairer future are actually inclusive. Based at least on the lines I stand in, that seems likely. Waiting in line here, we really are all equal, and remarkably civil about it too.
I joined a different kind of line a few nights ago, when I went for a nocturnal jog around La Plata’s main plaza. Unlike the queues for buses, the long line of runners, walkers, and in-line skaters was not so strictly regulated. The trees here absorb water during springtime’s regular, semi-tropical rainstorms, and release it when the skies are clear. So on this night, it felt as if it were raining, but the sky was clear and the stars were out. The big, cool drops are welcome during hot afternoons, and I appreciated them even more as I turned three, four, five laps around Plaza Moreno, cutting the line as I went.

